Comparison between ghost imaging and traditional active optical imaging

Wei-Tao Liu; Wei-Tao Liu

doi:10.1364/COSI.2018.CTh4A.3

Imaging and Applied Optics 2018 (3D, AO, AIO, COSI, DH, IS, LACSEA, LS&C, MATH, pcAOP)
OSA Technical Digest (Optica Publishing Group, 2018),
paper CTh4A.3
•https://doi.org/10.1364/COSI.2018.CTh4A.3

Comparison between ghost imaging and traditional active optical imaging

Wei-Tao Liu

Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging 2018

Orlando, Florida United States
25–28 June 2018
ISBN: 978-1-943580-44-6

From the session
Quantum Computational Imaging (CTh4A)

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
W. Liu, "Comparison between ghost imaging and traditional active optical imaging," in Imaging and Applied Optics 2018 (3D, AO, AIO, COSI, DH, IS, LACSEA, LS&C, MATH, pcAOP), OSA Technical Digest (Optica Publishing Group, 2018), paper CTh4A.3.

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

Considering spatial resolution, robustness, detection sensitivity, data acquisition, we made comparison on features of imaging methods between ghost imaging and traditional active optical imaging, under the same experimental conditions.

PDF Article

More Like This

Discussions on advantages of ghost imaging compared to traditional optical imaging

Wei-Tao Liu
JW4A.56 Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2016

Spatial resolution of compressive-sensing-based ghost imaging can approach theoretical limit

Xieyu Du, Junhui Li, Bin Luo, Dongchu Han, Dongyue Yang, Guohua Wu, and Hong Guo
JTu2A.129 Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2018

Blind Ghost Imaging

Alba M. Paniagua-Diaz, Ilya Starshynov, Nikos Fayard, Arthur Goetschy, Romain Pierrat, Remi Carminati, and Jacopo Bertolotti
CTu2F.1 Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging (COSI) 2021

Previous Article Next Article